Krioukov and his colleagues discovered
that the structure of the human brain has an almost ideal network of
connections (magenta), enabling optimal transmission of information
from one part of the brain to another.
Credit: Krioukov
Have you ever wondered why the human brain evolved the way it did?
A new study by Northeastern physicist Dmitri Krioukov and his
colleagues suggests an answer: to expedite the transfer of information
from one brain region to another, enabling us to operate at peak
capacity.
The paper, published in the July 3 issue of Nature Communications,
reveals that the structure of the human brain has an almost ideal
network of connections--the links that permit information to travel
from, say, the auditory cortex (responsible for hearing) to the motor
cortex (responsible for movement) so we can do everything from raise our
hand in class in response to a question to rock out to the beat of The
1975.
The findings represent more than a confirmation of our evolutionary
progress. They could have important implications for pinpointing the
cause of neurological disorders and eventually developing therapies to
treat them.
"An optimal network in the brain would have the smallest number of
connections possible, to minimize cost, and at the same time it would
have maximum navigability--that is, the most direct pathways for routing
signals from any possible source to any possible destination," says
Krioukov. It's a balance, he explains, raising and lowering his hands to
indicate a scale. The study presents a new strategy to find the
connections that achieve that balance or, as he puts it, "the sweet
spot."
Krioukov, an associate professor in the Department of Physics,
studies networks, from those related to massive Internet datasets to
those defining our brains. In the new research, he and his co-authors
used sophisticated statistical analyses based on Nobel laureate John
Nash's contributions to game theory to construct a map of an idealized
brain network--one that optimized the transfer of information. They then
compared the idealized map of the brain to a map of the brain's real
network and asked the question "How close are the two?"
Remarkably so. They were surprised to learn that 89 percent of the
connections in the idealized brain network showed up in the real brain
network as well. "That means the brain was evolutionarily designed to be
very, very close to what our algorithm shows," says Krioukov.
The scientists' strategy bucks tradition: It lets function--in this
case, navigability--drive the structure of the idealized network,
thereby showing which links are essential for optimal navigation. Most
researchers in the field, says Krioukov, build models of the real
network first, and only then address function, an approach that does not
highlight the most crucial links.
The new strategy is also transferable to a variety of disciplines.
The study, whose co-authors are at the Budapest University of Technology
and Economics, mapped six diverse navigable networks in total,
including that of the Internet, U.S. air¬ports, and Hungarian roads. The
Hungarian road network, for example, gave travelers the "luxury to go
on a road trip without a map," the authors wrote.
Future applications of the research cross disciplines, too. Knowing
what links in a network are the most critical for navigation tells you
where to focus protective measures, whether the site is the Internet,
roadways, train routes, or flight patterns.
"Conversely, if you're a good guy facing a terrorist network, you
know what links to attack first," says Krioukov. A systems designer
could locate the missing connections necessary to maximize the
navigability of a computer network and add them.
In the brain, the links existing in the idealized network are likely
those required for normal brain function, says Krioukov. He points to a
maze of magenta and turquoise tangles coursing through a brain
illustration in his paper and traces the magenta trail, which is present
in both the ideal and real brains.
"So we suspect that they are the primary candidates to look at if some disease develops--to see if they are dam-aged or broken."
Looking to the future, he speculates that once such links are
identified, new drugs or surgical techniques could perhaps be developed
to target them and repair, or circumvent, the damage.
"At the end of the day, what we are trying to do is to fix the
diseased network so that it can resume its normal function," says
Krioukov.
Story Source:
The above post is reprinted from
materials provided by
Northeastern University. The original item was written by Thea Singer.
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.