This illustration of the
replication cycle for circular bacterial DNA shows how Bacillus subtilis
bacteria use the ratio of proteins KinA to Spo0F to time their decision
to form spores. By copying the gene for Spo0F (purple) early in the
cell-division cycle and the gene for KinA (green) later in the cycle,
the bacteria assure that the decision to form a spore or divide is made
when DNA replication has completed.
Credit: L. Huang/Rice University
In spore-forming bacteria, chromosomal
locations of genes can couple the DNA replication cycle to critical,
once-in-a-lifetime decisions about whether to reproduce or form spores.
The new finding by Rice University bioengineers and colleagues at the
University of California at San Diego and the University of Houston
appears this week in the journal Cell.
Like most microorganisms, Bacillus subtilis bacteria are
single-celled creatures with one goal: to reproduce by making copies of
themselves. But survival isn't always that simple. For example, when
food gets scarce, B. subtilis must decide between two possible
paths: shut down, form a dormant spore -- a process called "sporulation"
-- and wait for better times or split into two cells and gamble that
there is enough food for at least one more generation.
"The decision about whether to form a spore and when is a very important one for B. subtilis,"
said Oleg Igoshin, associate professor of bioengineering at Rice and
one of the lead researchers on the new study. "If the organism waits too
long, it can starve before it finishes transforming into a spore. If it
acts too early and forms a spore too soon, it can be overwhelmed and
out-reproduced by competitors."
Igoshin's lab specializes in describing the workings of the complex
genetic regulatory networks that cells use to make such decisions. He
said dozens of studies over the past 25 years have identified a network
of more than 30 genes that B. subtilis uses to bring about
sporulation. When food is plentiful, this network is largely silent. But
during times of starvation the genes work in concert to form a spore.
B. subtilis is harmless to humans, but some dangerous bacteria like Bacillus anthracis,
the organism that causes anthrax, also form spores by a similar
mechanism. Scientists are keen to better understand the process, both to
protect public health and to explore the evolution of complex genetic
processes.
The exact workings of the sporulation network are complex. In 2012,
Igoshin and graduate student Jatin Narula analyzed a genetic circuit
downstream of the protein known as Spo0A, the "sporulation master
regulator," to explain how the network filters out noisy fluctuations in
Spo0A activity. By filtering out noise, cells are able to accurately
determine if Spo0A activity is above the threshold that triggers
sporulation.
In the new study, Narula, Igoshin and collaborators set out to explain how B. subtilis
times its sporulation decision with its cell-division cycle, a
programmed series of events that cells normally follow to reproduce.
"Successful sporulation requires two complete copies of the bacterial
chromosome, so coordination between the sporulation decision and the
completion of DNA replication is very important," Narula said. "A good
analogy might be a semester-long course in biology. Lessons are
presented in a particular order, and students are tested after they
learn. If the final exam were given in the first week, students would
almost certainly fail."
Igoshin said that when the researchers set out to find how
sporulation decisions were timed to the cell cycle, several studies
including prior work by team members, provided a significant clue: Under
starvation conditions, the activity of the master regulator gene had
been shown to spike once per cell cycle.
In investigating how this spike occurred, Narula pored through dozens
of published studies and noticed a discrepancy between some
experimental results and the widely accepted view of the interactions
between two key players in the sporulation network, a protein called
Spo0F and a kinase called KinA. To resolve this discrepancy, Narula
built a mathematical model in which excess Spo0F inhibits KinA activity.
The new model showed that changes in the ratio of KinA to Spo0F could
produce the pulse similar to those seen in experiments.
"The inhibition of KinA by 0F results in a 'negative feedback loop,'
which means the circuit output works to counteract the input that
triggers it," said Narula, co-lead author of the study. "Such loops are
common in engineered and biological systems and usually work to keep
things relatively constant despite external perturbations. A simple
example of negative feedback would be the thermostat on your house. When
temperature drops it will keep your heater on until the temperature is
back to normal. If there is a delay in the feedback loop, the system may
overreact and produce a surge. With the thermostat, for example, if the
heating unit continues to run for some time after the desired
temperature is reached, the temperature can transiently spike before
settling back to the desired level."
Igoshin and Narula said similar spikes appear to be a consequence of
the delayed negative feedback loop in the network that controls the
amount of the active Spo0A. Furthermore, these spikes were timed based
upon the positions of the KinA and Spo0F genes on the bacterial genome.
To divide and reproduce, bacteria must make a duplicate copy of their
DNA. Because replication of circular bacterial DNA always initiates at
one particular point, Narula surmised that the location of the KinA and
Spo0F genes could be crucial. If one were located near the point where
DNA replication began, the cell would contain two copies of that gene --
doubling the rate of production of that protein -- throughout the DNA
replication period. If the other gene were located on the part of the
circle that was copied last, the ratio of KinA to Spo0F would be
one-to-one only when DNA replication was nearly completed.
Igoshin and Narula used a mathematical model of the network to show
that this type of gene arrangement could account for spikes in Spo0A
activity after each round of DNA replication. To verify their idea, they
teamed with experimental biologists Anna Kuchina, co-lead author of the
study, and Gürol Süel, co-lead investigator, both of the University of
California at San Diego.
Experiments showed that the spikes of Spo0A activity always followed
completion of DNA replication as the model predicted. In addition,
Kuchina and colleagues used biotechnology to engineer mutant forms of B. subtilis
in which the two critical genes were located near one another. The
Spo0A spike from the delayed negative feedback loop was not observed in
the mutants, and they failed to produce spores. In another engineered
strain, the feedback loop between Spo0A and Spo0F was eliminated. This
led to a gradual increase in Spo0A activity as opposed to a spike, and
such cells were several times more likely to fail or die during
sporulation.
"We found that the relative location of sporulation genes on the DNA
circle were similar in more than 30 species of spore-forming bacteria,
including Bacillus anthracis," Igoshin said. "This evidence
suggests that the DNA timing mechanism is highly conserved, and it is
possible that other time-critical functions related to the cell cycle
may be regulated in a similar way.
Story Source:
The above post is reprinted from
materials provided by
Rice University. The original item was written by Jade Boyd.
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.